|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port Phillip Conservation Council Inc. A0020093K |
||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rosebud Skatepark VCAT Appeal |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Click on an underlined subject below, or one of the general topics above. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PPCC Inc. appeal to VCAT: PPCC Inc. appealed on the above matter to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to uphold hard-won state and local planning laws governing coastal matters. Despite the clear precedent below, and the strong case put by PPCC Inc, VCAT disallowed the appeal. 2003 VCAT Precedent:
In 2003, VCAT
upheld PPCC’s appeal against Mornington Peninsula Shire
Council’s (MPSC) proposal to construct a concrete skateboard ramp on
the Mornington Peninsula
Shire’s Proposal: The Shire granted itself a permit to
construct a skateboard facility that
is an almost identical to that disallowed Rye proposal on
the Rosebud foreshore reserve opposite Boneo Road, Rosebud, – at a
busy intersection with Point Nepean Rd, and blatantly ignored the VCAT
precedent. The land is zoned
PPRZ. Using Section
52 of 4 Subpoenas Served:
PPCC Inc. argued that the permit is not lawful, as State and local planning
provisions have been ignored, along with the VCAT precedent set at Major Campaign No. 39: PPCC Inc. has listed the Rosebud skatepark appeal as Campaign No. 39 on its Register of Major Campaigns. |
|
This page was last updated on 2006-07-17.